Interview-style article presenting a mother’s account of her son’s rape conviction, emphasizing the lack of technical evidence and arguing that the verdict relied primarily on testimony, raising concerns about evidentiary standards.
Investigative-style article alleging that young men have been convicted of rape in Sweden without corroborating evidence, framing this as a broader justice-system scandal.
Debate article arguing that outcomes in rape trials often depend on subjective credibility assessments rather than consistent evidentiary standards, creating arbitrary and unpredictable verdicts.
Long-form investigative feature examining outcomes under Sweden’s consent law, focusing on evidentiary limits, credibility judgments, and the trade-off between conviction rates and legal certainty.
Article arguing that young men are imprisoned for rape based on testimony alone, criticizing reliance on credibility assessments rather than corroborating evidence.
News article reporting that an increasing number of convictions are based primarily on oral testimony following the introduction of the consent law, highlighting debate among legal experts.